Miley Cyrus not so good a girl or is she
Ok, so I am not going to show the pictures, but why do we have to even ask a 15 year old to pose with only a sheet around their top? What made the photographer and her parents think it was ok? I seem to remember that there area laws that say you can’t photograph a child in any sexual position without breaking the law? I know her parents thought it was done tastefully and in plain view of them, but why would you want to expose your daughter to that life? Maybe I am just a prude but I wouldn’t have. The other photos are beautiful. I just don’t understand. Why do we ask our kids to grow up so fast. She is already a pop icon. Why make her a naked star as well? Let her make that decision when she is an adult. Let our kids be kids. IMHO
Tags: miley cyrusRelated Stories
POSTED IN: celebrities, entertainment
9 opinions for Miley Cyrus not so good a girl or is she
Maria
Apr 28, 2008 at 1:35 pm
Oh. My. Seriously inappropriate if it were my child, but I will not judge. I will not judge. I’m going to keep repeating that and forget that I already judged.
Karen
Apr 28, 2008 at 2:28 pm
I heard her name in the news today, but didn’t catch what it was about. I was going to google it, but now I don’t have to. That’s quite a seductive picture for a 15-year-old. I’m so disappointed. Are there ANY teenage celebrities out there that won’t do this? Are there any out there that I can let my daughter watch without worrying that my daughter will want to be like them?
heather
Apr 28, 2008 at 2:44 pm
If you look at the behind the scenes shots, she looks like a normal 15 year old girl (Jeans and a tube top looking shirt/dress thing). I think the final photo though is too sexy for a 15 year old. Especially since she is a role model for girls that are much younger than that. Personally I am totally prude and would never let my daughter look like that (In fact, I never look like that). But, not everyone feels the same way as me.
kellys
Apr 28, 2008 at 2:58 pm
So glad to know that I am not the only one.
JayMonster
Apr 28, 2008 at 4:20 pm
First of all she is not nude (though admittedly it is “suggestive” Despite what it appears, she is not “in bed” The biggest problem here is (it seems) having Ann Liebowitz as the photographer, as she is not exactly adverse to controversy.
If it were not for people (read: Trash Mags and sites) making such a big deal over this, and “suggesting” more I don’t think anybody would have cared. These pictures were going in Vanity Fair, not exactly a popular tween magazine.
Lindsey
Apr 28, 2008 at 4:42 pm
A rather inappropriate picture of a father and daughter.
Also, Sex and the City is good for a 15 year old? It’s no wonder the world is becoming sexually over stimulated.
heather
Apr 28, 2008 at 7:26 pm
And apparently she is embarrassed about it too: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080428/ap_en_ce/miley_s_growing_pains;_ylt=AvLMyrXZ94XxEm2tjvGqTLTQbbUC
Michelle Sullivan
Apr 28, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Oh i hate this I hope she is not heading down the wrong path. I just didnt think that she would and that her day wouldnt allow this. The photos were taken by a world renowned photog,what was she thinking…Publicity well ti worked.
kellys
Apr 29, 2008 at 8:28 am
I don’t think she is headed down the wrong path. I just think she made a bad decision. She apologized mainly to keep her clean image.
I didn’t find any inappropriate pictures of a father and daughter. I thought most of them were very sweet.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: